By Tilottama Rajan, Michael J. O'Driscoll
Every historical past of concept is concurrently a concept of heritage. Rajan and O'Driscoll's wide-ranging quantity tackles the problem of delivering an highbrow heritage of idea, given a substantial continuity among thought and the heritage of rules, and likewise given theory's personal wondering of conventional highbrow old versions. The editors handle this problem by means of offering 13 essays on various theorists from Derrida to Zizek. less than the paradigms of family tree, performativity, body structure, and expertise, the essayists discover metaphors for connecting the paintings of theorists from various occasions, which are drawn from components except background, and which may improve and revise our realizing of the histories of concept.
Not simply do those essays replicate the influence on writing approximately thought - and through extension on highbrow historical past - in parts similar to psychoanalysis, philosophy, literature, and cultural experiences, yet also they are an exploration of topic and scenario - the writing of highbrow heritage after the linguistic flip and the poststructuralist critique. Written for the speculation experts, in addition to highbrow historians and people within the humanities and social sciences who're curious about serious concept, the essays characterize a re-examination of the present country of concept, as addressed by way of prime students within the field.
Read or Download After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory PDF
Similar essays & correspondence books
Released 365 days after put out of your mind Foucault, within the Shadow of the Silent Majorities (1978) could be the most crucial sociopolitical manifesto of the 20 th century: it demands not anything under the top of either sociology and politics. Disenfranchised revolutionaries (the pink Brigades, the Baader-Meinhof Gang) was hoping to arrive the hundreds at once via astonishing activities, yet their message purely performed into the palms of the media and the nation.
Those letters supply an perception into the lifetime of a author whose novels remain bestsellers. They display a lot approximately Charlotte Bront:e's own lifestyles, her kin relationships, and the society within which she lived. a lot of her early letters are written with power, vivacity, and an attractive flair for self-mockery.
Parlando di Joseph Cornell, uno degli artisti che più amava, Parise addita nel «colpo d’occhio» l. a. chiave del suo sistema interpretativo. Ma proprio l. a. capacità di racchiudere in un dettaglio los angeles segreta morfologia di un personaggio è l. a. qualità che più colpisce in questi scritti, dove Parise ci parla soprattutto degli autori e dei libri che in line with lui hanno contato (con «incursioni ingiustificate» nel mondo dell’arte, della pittura e del cinema).
- Science, Technology and Culture (Issues in Cultural and Media Studies), 1st Edition
- The Troubadour of Knowledge (Studies in Literature and Science)
- Seeing Like a Feminist
- Letters, Statements & Texts
Additional resources for After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory
111:572-3) Comedy concludes art, yet not in the sense that it brings about even the fulfilment of subjectivity; it concludes art by holding up the difficulty that represented individuals could ever authentically represent a coming into its own of enlightened subjectivity. In Hegel's thinking explicitly of an art (Romantic and also comedic) that repeatedly announces a self-satisfied subjectivity, history has proved Hegel wrong; but in so far as the thesis on intentionality can, as it should, be attributed to him, he is implicitly right.
In one sense, for Hegel, subjectivity has an absolute value: it is the being that triumphs in comedy, apprehending its freedom and self-determination as it provokes and registers the dissolution of false goals and attachments. In another sense, subjectivity in comedy is the seat of untruth, for it is an order of individuality, of particularity, and, by degrees in Hegel's argument, of wrong-headedness, of perversity. To the extent that the subject has (ineluctably) identified itself with particular and one-sided goals, it is guilty and lost.
Most The Double Detour: Sartre and Heidegger 45 importantly, Sartre misrecognizes nihilation as something that unfolds 'in the existence of man' rather than in 'Being itself (261). 5 But it is clear three years earlier in Being and Nothingness, when politics is not the issue, that Sartre - after an initial enthusiasm for Heidegger in the mid-1930s - does not misunderstand but, rather, disagrees with him. ' But his phenomenology of negativity translates the latter's postmetaphysical idealism only in the sense that Heidegger himself uses the word 'translation,' to denote a process by which one cultural experience is transferred into 'a different way of thinking' (149), in this case French rather than German.